requestId:68499abd399924.45538479.

The first chapter of “Treeting” is re-examined

Author: Wu Feifei

Source: Author Author Authorized by Confucian Network

            Original edition of “Traditional China Research and Development Collection”, Shanghai Institute of Social Sciences Bookstore, November 2018 edition.

Time: Confucius was in the 2569th year of the 27th month of the Wuxu period, Jihai

              Jesus January 2, 2019

 

In modern Chinese thinking, the most valued text of “Traditional Notes” is no more than the article “Traditional Notes”, especially the common and well-off discussions in its opening. Due to the creative explanations of the two teachers Kang Youwei and Guo Moruo, it has a major impact on Chinese thinking for a century. However, since the 1970s, people have changed their understanding of the text of “Treunion” with the excavation of the unearthed literature and their emphasis on “Confucius’s Family”. In today’s academic world, Kang and Guo’s way of describing has been basically abandoned, but how to understand the article “Travel” has become a new problem. The author believes that although “Treunion” does not have the Utopian thinking that teachers Kang and Guo think, it still shows the main problems about the evolution of the gift, which is very important in the gift thinking and is also closely related to the historical understanding of Han Tang Rong. This article is a trial of understanding the text and principles of “Greetings”.

 

1. Questions in the commentary of “Greetings”

 

“Greetings” are an article in “Little Dai’s Gifts”, and Yu Liuxiang’s “Alien Records” is a “comprehensive discussion”. Zheng Kangcheng’s note: “The “Tongfu” refers to the way of changing the five emperors and three kings and the way of turning the yang and turning the yang.” Kong Jingda compared “Zeng Zi’s Question” and “Tongfu” and said: “Those who do not regard Ziyou as the title of the article, based on what Zengzi asked, the matter is complicated and unreasonable. In the catalog, Ziyou asked only about the matter of the transfer of gifts, so he regarded gifts as the key to his eyes and ears. “The changes in gifts and the transfer of gifts are of course the main issues in the study of gifts. In Han Tang, this is a more respected gift paper. But since the Song Dynasty, people have raised doubts about it from time to time. As Li Qingchen of the Northern Song Dynasty said, “When I viewed “The Legend of the Condor Heroes”, although there was a Master’s words, his top chapter talked about the Dao and the rule of the Three Dynasties, and his words were particularly confusing and unethical.” His doubts were important in three aspects: first, he regarded the whole country as the public, not only his own opinions, but also his own sons as the same, but also his own sons as the custom, but not the same morality as the king, minister, father and son as the same as the same as the same. Second, he believed that the integrity of human nature was “the foundation of raising an army”; third, the Zheng notes quoted Lao Tzu’s words, but only his own words and their own sons as the same as the customs, but not the same morality as the eternal ones of the king, minister, father and son as the same as the same as the same. Second, he believed that the integrity of human nature was “the foundation of raising an army”; third, the Zheng notes quoted Lao Tzu’s words, but only his own words were favored andTrust loyalty. He himself believed: “There are six-in-laws, there is life, there is no desire, there is competition, there is common people and the six-in-laws, there is a desire, there is a desire, there is a desire, there is a desire, there is a desire, there is a desire, and the things are born at the same time, and the desire is born at the same time, so even though Taichu cannot be defeated, there is no such thing as the “Treunion” as the “Treunion” is combined. Later, some scholars gave similar criticisms, saying that the common and well-off arguments in “Treunion” confused Lao Zhuang’s words, and even Teacher Liang Shuming thought that a piece of “Treunion” was not suitable for Confucius’ thoughts. [2] As Song Confucians analyzed two articles: “Big Learning” and “Doing the Mean”, the position of “Tong Yu” is even more obscure.

 

But after Kang Youwei, the position of “Travel” was finally won. The “Notes on the Gift” published by Kang in 1884 combines Gong Yang III’s statement with Oriental Utopian thoughts, and believes that the “bigness” in “Travel” is to inherit the peaceful world, and the “well-off” of the “Three Generations of Heroes” is to promote the peaceful world, and the era of Confucius’s own career is a chaotic world. He said: “If there is a country, a family, and a self, each has its own boundaries and is selfless. It harms justice and hinders evolution. It is so great! But heaven is the foundation of the birth of man, and everyone is born and straightforward. Anyone under the heaven is made public, so it cannot establish a country, so it will be in conflict with each other; there must be no family, so that love will not be widespread; and it will not be able to conceive the world, so that the power of the goods will be self-reliant.” [3] Later, in “Big Tong Book”, he developed this thought step by step, and described the situation after the big society regained the public ownership, the country, the family, etc.

 

 

 

Kang Youyi is the manuscript of “The Book of the Great”

 

In the “China Modern Society Research”, Mr. Guo Moruo inherited Kang’s words and learned from the great common people that practiced the primitive communist society in the popular matriarchal marriage system, and a well-off society after the birth of the family, public ownership and the country. [4] Although the terms used by the two teachers and teachers are different, the way they understand “Travel” from the historical view of the Eastern World is the same. Moreover, the two teachers and teachers’ understanding of the sameness and well-off society directly inherited Li Qingchen’s understanding since that is, they believe that the age of the sameness is all private and has no family, so there is no gift from father, son, king and minister. However, because of the differences in position and standards, they did not criticize this paragraph like Li Qingchen, but instead believed that this period is often the main source of thinking.

 

Mr. Mou Zongsan also attaches great importance to the article “Travel”. Like Mr. Kang and Guo, he also tried to use Western thinking to understand the distinction between great commonality and well-off society. He only believed that the system relied on Confucius’ fantasy of similarity to civil system, and its economic equality is of socialism, and the political power in the world of a well-off society is private. But Mr. Mou had a little difference not only with the second teacher, but also with Li Qingchen’s understanding since then. That is, he did not believe that “not treating others alone, not giving others alone” means that there is no family, so there is no father-son bondage. Otherwise, how can we explain the meaning of “a man has a separation, and a woman has a grace”? The second teacher and the chief teacher have also clearly realized this difficulty. Kang said that “learning” is the word “英”, and Guo said that these two sentences are for the introduction of later generations. But Mr. Mou only believed that this was a common economic and political equality of “wide moral consciousness” [5], because the “Travel” never said that the family should be abolished in the same age, “not only regarding his relatives, not only his sons but also his sons” did not expect that it would not regard his relatives, not only his sons but also his sons. Zhang Wenqu once said: “Since you say you don’t want to be a relative or a son, you must first treat your parents and a son.” [6] Teacher Mou clearly deeply analyzed the logic of this paragraph.

 

The original theme of “Treat” is “Treat Transfers”, and Teachers Kang and Guo completely neglected this point, and strongly attached it to Oriental Utopian Thoughts. Teacher Mou has never forgotten that the theme of this article is “Greetings”, so he deeply analyzes the tags described here: The historical evolution of entertainment circle, female strongman, female supporting role, and time travel: “In fact, this is only the beginning of the development of humanistic history. In this development, there is a gift to be sent. Therefore, the following text urgently mentions the “urgent gift” and the highest meaning and influence of gifts. This is not just about the evolution of gifts, but actually the development of gifts through history. Gifts represent people’s energy, fantasies and people . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .